IBI Spotlights call attention to important health and productivity findings from peer-reviewed work. The research described in this particular Spotlight is authored or co-authored by an IBI researcher. IBI members are encouraged to obtain the original articles from the copyright holder.
Employers understand that employees’ illnesses impose lost productivity costs in terms of both absence and presenteeism. However, it is not clear how often employees attend work while ill, relative to missing work.
Illness episodes typically result in absence from work rather than working a normal or adjusted routine. Employees work a normal or adjusted routine when ill largely in order to save leave or because they have too much work. When an ill employee has the flexibility to adjust their work routine, they are more likely to work a different schedule or at a different location rather than miss work entirely.
Gifford, B., Jinnett, K. (2013). Employees’ Work Responses to Episodes of Illness: Evidence From the American Time Use Survey. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 56(2):224-229.
To better understand presenteeism and absenteeism on the basis of the choices employees make about working when they experience episodes of illness.
We examine nationally representative data to describe employees’ work responses to episodes of illness and how different leave policies contribute to their decisions.
Although flexibility to adjust work routines can reduce absences, it is not known to what extent productivity suffers when this occurs. Measures of both short- and long-term presenteeism are necessary to understand the full productivity costs of illness in the workforce.
Brian Gifford, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate, Integrated Benefits Institute, and Kimberly Jinnett, Ph.D., Research Director Integrated Benefits Institute, contributed as authors to this research article.